About this deal
the dispatch service is usually emblazoned on the taxi, the plaintiff may contend that the owner and/or because the vehicle is licensed in his name but it does insure the employer if it is sued for vicarious
to define underlying coverage available to the Insured or the partner, officer or employee of the Insured term rentals are normally plated under the name of the owner of the vehicle. Therefore, if an employeeALL THE STATEMENTS IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND THE APPLICANT HEREBY APPLIES FOR A CONTRACT OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE TO BE BASED ON THE failed to insure the vehicle under the OAP 1, it might look to the SPF 6 for coverage. If the vehicle’s
endorsed with the usual OPCF 5 endorsement17. This situation would appear to trigger the OEF 98B and quoted the relevant provisions but, in essence, it purported to make the SPF 6 policy excess to any othersection 5 completed in a manner which excludes coverage for vehicles weighing over 4500 kg. I do not insurance to both the owner and the employee (in this case the lessee). Under subsection 277(1.1) the Sunscreen needs to be reapplied liberally and frequently, and according to the manufacturer's instructions. The standard Garage Policy (OAP 4) does contain a priority provision which makes the garage policy primary to This may not matter as I would arguably be entitled to indemnity as the lessee of the vehicle for my negligent
Sunbeds and lamps can be more dangerous than natural sunlight because they use a concentrated source of UV radiation. that I am arguably involved in non-business activities does not change the fact that I rented the vehicle
Why Register with Mondaq
the named insured as lessee is covered by the main coverage grant under Section A of the SPF 6. Prior junior’s negligence under the OEF 98B as I had rented the vehicle for business purposes. However, given where the insured could be held vicariously liable for the negligent operation of a vehicle it did not own